[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1328926042.2476.3.camel@laptop>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2012 03:07:22 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
paul@...lmenage.org, tj@...nel.org, frank.rowand@...sony.com,
pjt@...gle.com, tglx@...utronix.de, lizf@...fujitsu.com,
prashanth@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] CPU hotplug, cpusets: Fix CPU online handling
related to cpusets
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 23:39 +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> > I don't see why not. Presumably no CPUs will be added or removed while
> > the system is asleep.
>
> ACPI explicitly forbids that level of hardware reconfiguration in a sleep
> state (even in S4), AFAICS. Still, people may try to do that ...
I'm ok with breaking that :-) If its really really important to someone
we (him most likely) could fix it by detecting the topology changed over
the suspend and do a fixup. Assuming it actually gets that far.
Srivatsa, wanna give this (the proposal to not modify cpusets on
CPU_TASKS_FROZEN) a try?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists