[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120212191134.GQ23916@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2012 19:11:34 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
user-mode-linux-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: your mail
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 01:21:10AM +0100, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> @@ -343,7 +267,7 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> {
> struct chan *chan = data;
> struct line *line = chan->line;
> - struct tty_struct *tty = line->tty;
> + struct tty_struct *tty = tty_port_tty_get(&line->port);
> int err;
>
> /*
> @@ -354,6 +278,9 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> spin_lock(&line->lock);
> err = flush_buffer(line);
> if (err == 0) {
> + tty_kref_put(tty);
> +
> + spin_unlock(&line->lock);
> return IRQ_NONE;
> } else if (err < 0) {
> line->head = line->buffer;
> @@ -365,9 +292,12 @@ static irqreturn_t line_write_interrupt(int irq, void *data)
> return IRQ_NONE;
>
> tty_wakeup(tty);
> + tty_kref_put(tty);
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
That, BTW, smells ugly. Note that return before the last one has no
tty_kref_put() for a very good reason - it's under if (!tty). And
just as line->tty, port->tty can become NULL, so tty_port_tty_get()
can, indeed, return NULL here. Which makes the first tty_kref_put()
oopsable...
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists