linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/5] Clean up x86 CPU auto-loading

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sun, 12 Feb 2012 17:26:44 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Thomas Renninger <trenn@...e.de>
CC:	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, x86@...nel.org,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Clean up x86 CPU auto-loading

On 02/12/2012 03:10 PM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> On Saturday 11 February 2012 23:44:16 Ben Hutchings wrote:
>> This series fixes a number of apparent bugs in the recent changes to
>> enable auto-loading by x86 CPU ID.
> 
> These all look correct.
> I should have spotted the intel_idle modifications myself.
> Good catch(es).
> 
> Greg: I expect these should get queued in your driver-core-next branch?
> 

Either that or we can carry them in -tip as x86 patches, since there
isn't a pending conflict this time.

	-hpa


-- 
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel.  I don't speak on their behalf.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/