[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO+b5-qADXdd4_MUn_yNNXtYSyEBdmT+iW0AtdqjyAcGp=H6ZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:08:27 +0100
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Christian Hoff <christian.hoff@...ibm.com>,
borntrae@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
mst@...hat.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au
Subject: Re: Pe: [PATCH v5 1/3] virtio-scsi: first version
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:05 AM, Christian Borntraeger
<borntraeger@...ibm.com> wrote:
> On 12/02/12 21:16, James Bottomley wrote:
> > Could someone please explain to me why you can't simply fix virtio-blk?
>
> I dont think that virtio-scsi will replace virtio-blk everywhere. For non-scsi
> block devices, image files or logical volumes virtio-blk seems to be the right
> approach, I think.
>
> > Or would virtio-blk maintainers give a reason why they're unwilling to
> > have it fixed?
>
> I dont consider virtio-blk broken. It just doesnt cover everything.
Although I'm not sure whether that helps here: since about a year
there is software present in the upstream kernel that allows to use
any block device or even a file as a SCSI device.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists