[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120213120814.GP6614@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:08:15 +0200
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc: linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
"Shimoda, Yoshihiro" <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>,
linux-sh@...r.kernel.org, Magnus Damm <magnus.damm@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] usb: fix renesas_usbhs to not schedule in atomic
context
Hi,
On Thu, Feb 09, 2012 at 11:17:51PM +0100, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
> @@ -997,7 +991,7 @@ static bool usbhsf_dma_filter(struct dma_chan *chan, void *param)
> *
> * usbhs doesn't recognize id = 0 as valid DMA
> */
> - if (0 == slave->slave_id)
> + if (0 == slave->simple_slave.slave_id)
> return false;
>
> chan->private = slave;
> @@ -1176,8 +1170,8 @@ int usbhs_fifo_probe(struct usbhs_priv *priv)
> fifo->port = D0FIFO;
> fifo->sel = D0FIFOSEL;
> fifo->ctr = D0FIFOCTR;
> - fifo->tx_slave.slave_id = usbhs_get_dparam(priv, d0_tx_id);
> - fifo->rx_slave.slave_id = usbhs_get_dparam(priv, d0_rx_id);
> + fifo->tx_slave.simple_slave.slave_id = usbhs_get_dparam(priv, d0_tx_id);
> + fifo->rx_slave.simple_slave.slave_id = usbhs_get_dparam(priv, d0_rx_id);
what are these "simple_slave" changes ? They have nothing to do with
$SUBJECT ? In fact, breaks my gadget branch.
How many times does a maintainer have to ask for contributors to keep
changes atomic ? One patch == One single, self-contained, change.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists