[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120213142418.GA6478@quack.suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:24:18 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
mpatocka@...hat.com, Eric Sandeen <sandeen@...deen.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] vfs: Provide function to get superblock and wait
for it to thaw
On Sun 12-02-12 21:13:25, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 11:03:00AM +0100, Jan Kara wrote:
> > In quota code we need to find a superblock corresponding to a device and wait
> > for superblock to be unfrozen. However this waiting has to happen without
> > s_umount semaphore because that is required for superblock to thaw. So provide
> > a function in VFS for this to keep dances with s_umount where they belong.
>
> Eww... All it takes is
> struct super_block *get_super_thawed(struct block_device *bdev)
> {
> while (1) {
> struct super_block *s = get_super(bdev);
> if (!s || s->s_frozen == SB_UNFROZEN)
> return s;
> up_read(&s->s_umount);
> vfs_check_frozen(s, SB_FREEZE_WRITE);
> put_super(s);
> }
> }
> and there's no need of extra arguments, etc. whatsoever. Both patches
> applied, with implementation of get_super_thawed() done as above.
Yeah, this looks better. Thanks!
Honza
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
SUSE Labs, CR
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists