[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <032e5eba814724ec4f14c6b26bb2fa8556595efe.1329139662.git.nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 15:43:04 +0100
From: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
To: plagnioj@...osoft.com, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
grant.likely@...retlab.ca, rob.herring@...xeda.com
Cc: tglx@...utronix.de, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
avictor.za@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4/9] ARM: at91/gpio: change comments and one variable name
What was true only on at91sam9263 about the sharing of a single AIC
IRQ line for several GPIO banks is now used by several Atmel SoCs.
Change a variable name to allow better understanding while
introducing IRQ domains in following patches.
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Acked-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
---
arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c | 25 ++++++++++++++-----------
1 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
index 74d6783..b762afc 100644
--- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
+++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/gpio.c
@@ -29,8 +29,8 @@
struct at91_gpio_chip {
struct gpio_chip chip;
struct at91_gpio_chip *next; /* Bank sharing same clock */
- int id; /* ID of register bank */
- void __iomem *regbase; /* Base of register bank */
+ int pioc_hwirq; /* PIO bank interrupt identifier on AIC */
+ void __iomem *regbase; /* PIO bank virtual address */
struct clk *clock; /* associated clock */
};
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@ static int gpio_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned state)
else
wakeups[bank] &= ~mask;
- irq_set_irq_wake(gpio_chip[bank].id, state);
+ irq_set_irq_wake(gpio_chip[bank].pioc_hwirq, state);
return 0;
}
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ void __init at91_gpio_irq_setup(void)
for (pioc = 0, this = gpio_chip, prev = NULL;
pioc++ < gpio_banks;
prev = this, this++) {
- unsigned id = this->id;
+ unsigned pioc_hwirq = this->pioc_hwirq;
unsigned i;
__raw_writel(~0, this->regbase + PIO_IDR);
@@ -518,14 +518,14 @@ void __init at91_gpio_irq_setup(void)
}
/* The toplevel handler handles one bank of GPIOs, except
- * AT91SAM9263_ID_PIOCDE handles three... PIOC is first in
- * the list, so we only set up that handler.
+ * on some SoC it can handles up to three...
+ * We only set up the handler for the first of the list.
*/
if (prev && prev->next == this)
continue;
- irq_set_chip_data(id, this);
- irq_set_chained_handler(id, gpio_irq_handler);
+ irq_set_chip_data(pioc_hwirq, this);
+ irq_set_chained_handler(pioc_hwirq, gpio_irq_handler);
}
pr_info("AT91: %d gpio irqs in %d banks\n", irq - gpio_to_irq(0), gpio_banks);
}
@@ -615,7 +615,7 @@ void __init at91_gpio_init(struct at91_gpio_bank *data, int nr_banks)
for (i = 0; i < nr_banks; i++) {
at91_gpio = &gpio_chip[i];
- at91_gpio->id = data[i].id;
+ at91_gpio->pioc_hwirq = data[i].pioc_hwirq;
at91_gpio->chip.base = i * 32;
at91_gpio->regbase = ioremap(data[i].regbase, 512);
@@ -633,8 +633,11 @@ void __init at91_gpio_init(struct at91_gpio_bank *data, int nr_banks)
/* enable PIO controller's clock */
clk_enable(at91_gpio->clock);
- /* AT91SAM9263_ID_PIOCDE groups PIOC, PIOD, PIOE */
- if (last && last->id == at91_gpio->id)
+ /*
+ * GPIO controller are grouped on some SoC:
+ * PIOC, PIOD and PIOE can share the same IRQ line
+ */
+ if (last && last->pioc_hwirq == at91_gpio->pioc_hwirq)
last->next = at91_gpio;
last = at91_gpio;
--
1.7.9
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists