linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] PM / Runtime: Introduce flag can_power

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.44L0.1202130958440.1434-100000@iolanthe.rowland.org>
Date:	Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:01:54 -0500 (EST)
From:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
To:	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>
cc:	Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...ox.com>,
	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-ide@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
	<linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/6] PM / Runtime: Introduce flag can_power_off

On Mon, 13 Feb 2012, Lin Ming wrote:

> From: Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>
> 
> Introduce flag can_power_off in device structure to support runtime
> power off/on.
> 
> Note that, for a specific device driver,
> "support runtime power off/on" means that the driver .runtime_suspend
> callback needs to
> 1) save all the context so that it can restore the device back to the previous
>    working state after powered on.
> 2) set can_power_off flag to tell the driver model that it's ready for power off.
> 
> The following example shows how this works.
> 
> device A
>  |---------|
>  v         v
> device B  device C
> 
> A is the parent of device B and device C, and device A/B/C shares the
> same power logic
> (Only device A knows how to turn on/off the power).
> 
> In order to power off A, B, C at runtime,
> 1) device B and device C should support runtime power off
>    (runtime suspended with can_power_off flag set)
> 2) pm idle request for device A is fired by runtime PM core.
> 3) in device A .runtime_suspend callback, it tries to set can_power_off flag.
> 4) if succeed, it means all its children have been ready for power off
>    and it can turn off the power at any time.
> 5) if failed, it means at least one of its children does not support runtime
>    power off, thus the power can not be turned off.

I'm not sure if this is really the right approach.  What you're trying 
to do is implement two different low-power states, basically D3hot and 
D3cold.  Currently the runtime PM core doesn't support such things; all 
it knows about is low power and full power.

Before doing an ad-hoc implementation, it would be best to step back
and think about other subsystems.  Other sorts of devices may well have
multiple low-power states.  What's the best way for this to be
supported by the PM core?

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/