[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120213164309.GA9160@hardened-box.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:43:09 -0200
From: Rajiv Andrade <srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stefan Berger <stefanb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dan.Morav@...oton.com,
KC@...oton.com, Dan Morav <dmorav@...oton.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] TPM: Nuvoton I2C driver
On Fri, 10 Feb 2012, Stefan Berger wrote:
> On 02/07/2012 08:06 AM, Rajiv Andrade wrote:
> > From: Dan.Morav@...oton.com<Dan.Morav@...oton.com>
> >
> > Below are the additions for WPCT301/NPCT501 Nuvoton Technology
> > TPM with I2C interface device driver. This driver uses Linux I2C
> > bus driver to interface with the I2C bus and Linux TPM driver (tpm.ko),
> > to export the standard Linux TPM interface. This driver requires an
> > I2C bus driver and TPM driver (tpm.ko) to be loaded prior to its loading.
> > This driver tested on Linux kernel version 3.3 on an x86 based platform.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Morav<dmorav@...oton.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Rajiv Andrade<srajiv@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> [...]
> > +
> > endif # TCG_TPM
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile b/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile
> > index ea3a1e0..064669a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/Makefile
> > @@ -9,3 +9,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_TIS) += tpm_tis.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_NSC) += tpm_nsc.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_ATMEL) += tpm_atmel.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_INFINEON) += tpm_infineon.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_TCG_NUVOTON_I2C) += tpm_nuvoton_i2c.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_nuvoton_i2c.c b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_nuvoton_i2c.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000..daf0d49
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_nuvoton_i2c.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,718 @@
> > +/******************************************************************************
> > + * Nuvoton TPM I2C Device Driver Interface for WPCT301/NPCT501,
> > + * based on the TCG TPM Interface Spec version 1.2.
> > + * Specifications at www.trustedcomputinggroup.org
>
> Since it's implemented following non-proprietary specs, would this
> driver qualify as the generic tpm_i2c driver or is there anything
> besides the device-id,vendor-id + firmware work-around in the driver
> specific to this particular device implementation.
>
> Regards,
> Stefan
There isn't. There are other i2c TPMs out there though, but my intention is to
keep it all in single tpm_i2c driver in case it's true for them as well.
Rajiv
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists