[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120213190542.GL15955@infradead.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:05:42 -0200
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung.kim@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 01/11] perf tools: Introduce struct perf_maps_opts
Em Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 11:50:29AM -0700, David Ahern escreveu:
> The cleanup might make my multiple tid/pid patch easier: e.g.,
>
> struct perf_target{
> ...
> char errmsg[128];
> };
>
> Then if the tid/pid string parsing fails in perf_evlist__create_maps and
> friends the errmsg can be put into the buffer for the callers to get a
> more useful message to the user as to what happened.
>
> Today's perf if you give it an invalid pid, scandir fails and the
> command spits out the usage statement. Which is completely confusing --
> ie., not clear that the command failed b/c the pid does not exist.
Humm, ok, but then I think we should have an enum + a strerror(3)
equivalent, i.e.:
enum perf_target_error perf_evlist__create_maps(...);
int perf_target__strerror(struct perf_target *target, int errnum,
char *buf, size_t buflen);
Please see 'man strerror_r", and make it work like the POSIX compliant
variant.
Ok, so it may be better to first process Kim's patches and then you
rework yours?
- Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists