[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329161933.20751.31.camel@dabdike>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:38:53 -0500
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: scsi_error: do not allow IO errors with certain ILLEGAL_REQUEST
sense to be retryable
On Mon, 2012-02-13 at 14:36 -0500, Mike Snitzer wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13 2012 at 2:16pm -0500,
> Martin K. Petersen <martin.petersen@...cle.com> wrote:
>
> > >>>>> "Mike" == Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com> writes:
> >
> > >> I don't have a fundamental problem with your patch. But since we
> > >> explicitly handle ILLEGAL REQUEST with 0x20 and 0x24 in sd.c I wonder
> > >> what's broken? We should disable discard support if the WRITE SAME w/
> > >> UNMAP fails.
> >
> > Mike> Yeah, I thought the disabling would be sufficient too. But
> > Mike> unfortunately multipath doesn't inspect the request it is retrying
> > Mike> (after it fails the path the request just failed on).
> >
> > Well, we shouldn't be returning something that multipath should ever act
> > on.
> >
> > I think I understand what's going on. Can you try the following patch?
>
> Looks good to me (small nit below), it'll solve the immediate problem,
> I'll pass it on. Please add my:
>
> Acked-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@...hat.com>
>
> But I also think establishing a baseline of TARGET_ERROR for certain
> ILLEGAL REQUEST is still sane and should go in too...
So someone still needs to package up the final agreed version with a
nice changelog and send it to the list ...
James
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists