[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYm3sb7wbJP1M9HmjkGHq1YuT06ar6-+V1RoZ1QdoT9BA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:48:19 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>,
Rajendra Nayak <rajendra.nayak@...aro.org>,
Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang@...vell.com>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] pinctrl: move the core per-device handlers to core
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 7:18 AM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com> wrote:
> I'll probably want to rework the 3 patches your changes break anyway (in
> order to completely remove use of board-*-pinmux.c when booting from DT,
> once I write the DT code) and so you may as well not apply them, just
> the driver itself. It'll save some churn.
OK will that happen for this merge window or is the driver going to sit
unused for the 3.4 cycle?
I'm mainly thinking if the underlying driver may be subject to change I
could just keep it out-of-tree, unless you want it merged in for some
practical reason, then I'll just merge it.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists