[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120213225115.GT9751@redhat.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 17:51:15 -0500
From: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
vgoyal@...hat.com, ebiederm@...ssion.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [tip:x86/debug] x86/kdump: No need to disable ioapic/ lapic in
crash path
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 05:12:58PM -0500, Don Zickus wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 08:52:19AM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:28 AM, Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com> wrote:
> > > On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 05:04:15PM -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
> > >> >
> > >> > v2: removed the disable lapic code too
> > >>
> > >> with this commit, kdump is not working anymore on my setups with
> > >> Nehalem, Westmere, sandbridge.
> > >> these setup all have VT-d enabled.
> > >
> > > Hi Yinghai,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the report. Can you attach the .config you were using and what
> > > vendor you were using for Nehalem, Westmere and Sandybridge. I'll try to
> > > reproduce it in my lab.
> >
> > Sure, please check attached one
>
> Looks like I can reproduce the hang with my original patch and things work
> when we stick the disable_local_APIC() back in there. I'll keep poking.
Hmm, my config worked fine in both cases, hence why I didn't catch it (its
based on a bloated Fedora config). I'll look at the differences to see if
something pops out.
Cheers,
Don
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists