lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1329219673-28711-10-git-send-email-matt@console-pimps.org>
Date:	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:40:42 +0000
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 09/40] frv: Use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()

From: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>

As described in e6fa16ab ("signal: sigprocmask() should do
retarget_shared_pending()") the modification of current->blocked is
incorrect as we need to check whether the signal we're about to block
is pending in the shared queue.

Also, use the new helper function introduced in commit 5e6292c0f28f
("signal: add block_sigmask() for adding sigmask to current->blocked")
which centralises the code for updating current->blocked after
successfully delivering a signal and reduces the amount of duplicate
code across architectures. In the past some architectures got this
code wrong, so using this helper function should stop that from
happening again.

Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>
---
 arch/frv/kernel/signal.c |   32 ++++++++++----------------------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/frv/kernel/signal.c b/arch/frv/kernel/signal.c
index bab0129..dfa460e 100644
--- a/arch/frv/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/arch/frv/kernel/signal.c
@@ -40,12 +40,13 @@ struct fdpic_func_descriptor {
  */
 asmlinkage int sys_sigsuspend(int history0, int history1, old_sigset_t mask)
 {
-	mask &= _BLOCKABLE;
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+	sigset_t blocked;
+
 	current->saved_sigmask = current->blocked;
-	siginitset(&current->blocked, mask);
-	recalc_sigpending();
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+
+	mask &= _BLOCKABLE;
+	siginitset(&blocked, mask);
+	set_current_blocked(&blocked);
 
 	current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
 	schedule();
@@ -158,10 +159,7 @@ asmlinkage int sys_sigreturn(void)
 		goto badframe;
 
 	sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-	current->blocked = set;
-	recalc_sigpending();
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+	set_current_blocked(&set);
 
 	if (restore_sigcontext(&frame->sc, &gr8))
 		goto badframe;
@@ -184,10 +182,7 @@ asmlinkage int sys_rt_sigreturn(void)
 		goto badframe;
 
 	sigdelsetmask(&set, ~_BLOCKABLE);
-	spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-	current->blocked = set;
-	recalc_sigpending();
-	spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
+	set_current_blocked(&set);
 
 	if (restore_sigcontext(&frame->uc.uc_mcontext, &gr8))
 		goto badframe;
@@ -474,15 +469,8 @@ static int handle_signal(unsigned long sig, siginfo_t *info,
 	else
 		ret = setup_frame(sig, ka, oldset);
 
-	if (ret == 0) {
-		spin_lock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-		sigorsets(&current->blocked, &current->blocked,
-			  &ka->sa.sa_mask);
-		if (!(ka->sa.sa_flags & SA_NODEFER))
-			sigaddset(&current->blocked, sig);
-		recalc_sigpending();
-		spin_unlock_irq(&current->sighand->siglock);
-	}
+	if (ret == 0)
+		block_sigmask(ka, sig);
 
 	return ret;
 
-- 
1.7.4.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ