[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120214143800.69703df9@stein>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:38:00 +0100
From: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
Cc: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>,
jbottomley@...allels.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Huajun Li <huajun.li.lee@...il.com>,
Axel Theilmann <theilmann@...-sense.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Yet another hot unplug NULL pointer dereference (was Re: status
of oops in sd_revalidate_disk?)
On Feb 14 Bart Van Assche wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 12:34 PM, Jun'ichi Nomura
> <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com> wrote:
> > While scsi_device is propery refcounted object,
> > q->queuedata is set to NULL by scsi_remove_device() asynchronously.
> > So every reader of scsi_device's q->queuedata should always check it.
>
> As far as I can see this patch narrows the race window but doesn't fix
> the race. At least sd_prep_fn() still reads queuedata and if I'm not
> mistaken that read races with scsi_remove_device(). Has it been
> considered to modify scsi_remove_device() and scsi_request_fn() such
> that device removal is communicated from the former to the latter in
> another way than by clearing queuedata ?
Or asked differently, *what* is supposed to serialize the ->queuedata
accesses?
(If it is the BKL -- well, some bleeding edge kernel versions lack it,
sources say.)
--
Stefan Richter
-=====-===-- --=- -===-
http://arcgraph.de/sr/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists