linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 00/40] arch: set_current_blocked() and block

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1329228510.3675.66.camel@mfleming-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 14:08:30 +0000
From:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To:	Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>
Cc:	linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/40] arch: set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()

On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 08:58 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 13:52 +0000, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-02-14 at 08:45 -0500, Mark Salter wrote:
> > > The c6x patch seems to be missing from the series.
> > 
> > I don't think it is. It reached lkml.org OK,
> > 
> > 	https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/14/123
> > 
> > The post to the linux-c6x-dev mailing list is awaiting moderator
> > approval but seeing as you were Cc'd on the patch I would have expected
> > it to reach your inbox with problems.
> > 
> Yup. I should have been more patient. I see it now.

Heh, I meant *without* problems ;-)

-- 
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/