linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: fix powerpc linux-next break on zsmalloc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4F3A6ECD.7030504@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 08:25:17 -0600
From:	Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Marc Dietrich <marvin24@....de>
CC:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: fix powerpc linux-next break on zsmalloc

On 02/14/2012 05:39 AM, Marc Dietrich wrote:
> Am 14.02.2012 12:22, schrieb Marc Dietrich:
>> Am 13.02.2012 15:47, schrieb Seth Jennings:
>>> linux/vmalloc.h added to zsmalloc-main.c to resolve implicit
>>> declaration errors.
>>>
>>> X86 dependency added to zsmalloc and dependent drivers zcache and zram.
>>>
>>> This X86 only requirement is not ideal.  Working to find portable
>>> functions for __flush_tlb_one and set_pte.
>>
>> sorry, zcache/zram works fine one ARM here. Why not depend on !POWERPC?
> 
> ups, sorry again, I tested an older version only. flush_tlb_one and 
> set_pte is only used with the new allocator as it seems.

Hey Marc,

I haven't forgotten about you.  I know that zcache (and therefore) zsmalloc
must work on ARM to be viable since there are known ARM users.  When we have
a solution, I'll be contacting you to test it on ARM :)

--
Seth

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/