[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120214150455.GN4141@mwanda>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:04:55 +0300
From: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To: Danny Kukawka <danny.kukawka@...ect.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Michael Hennerich <michael.hennerich@...log.com>,
linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, Danny Kukawka <dkukawka@...e.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] adis16080: fix compiler -Wuninitialized
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:35:36PM +0100, Danny Kukawka wrote:
> Fix for:
> drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16080_core.c: In function
> ‘adis16080_read_raw’:
> drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16080_core.c:99:8: warning: ‘ut’
> may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wuninitialized]
>
> Initialize ut and change error handling from adis16080_read_raw().
>
> Signed-off-by: Danny Kukawka <danny.kukawka@...ect.de>
> ---
> drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16080_core.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16080_core.c b/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16080_core.c
> index 1815490..e0b2a29 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16080_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/gyro/adis16080_core.c
> @@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ static int adis16080_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> long mask)
> {
> int ret = -EINVAL;
> - u16 ut;
> + u16 ut = 0;
> /* Take the iio_dev status lock */
>
> mutex_lock(&indio_dev->mlock);
> @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ static int adis16080_read_raw(struct iio_dev *indio_dev,
> if (ret < 0)
> break;
> ret = adis16080_spi_read(indio_dev, &ut);
> - if (ret < 0)
> + if (ret)
> break;
Either one of these changes would silence the warning from gcc
(which is a false positive). I would keep the "ut = 0;" change and
leave the error handling the same. That way we check for less than
zero consistently instead of checking some for non-zero and some for
less than zero.
I normally wouldn't have commented on this if the changelog had said
whether it was a gcc false positive or if the code changes the
behavior. It really should be mentioned.
If you could put a "Staging:" and an "iio" in the subject, that
would be grand as well. Everyone seems to be using the prefix
"staging:iio:gyro:adis16080" for that file... I don't know why they
don't just use slashes if they're going to specify the whole file...
regards,
dan carpenter
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists