[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120214153836.GA21106@amt.cnet>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 13:38:36 -0200
From: Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@...hat.com>
To: Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>
Cc: avi@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
ryanh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, aliguori@...ibm.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4 V13] Avoid soft lockup message when KVM is stopped by
host
On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 10:29:31AM -0500, Eric B Munson wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Feb 2012, Eric B Munson wrote:
>
> >
> > When a guest kernel is stopped by the host hypervisor it can look like a soft
> > lockup to the guest kernel. This false warning can mask later soft lockup
> > warnings which may be real. This patch series adds a method for a host
> > hypervisor to communicate to a guest kernel that it is being stopped. The
> > final patch in the series has the watchdog check this flag when it goes to
> > issue a soft lockup warning and skip the warning if the guest knows it was
> > stopped.
> >
> > It was attempted to solve this in Qemu, but the side effects of saving and
> > restoring the clock and tsc for each vcpu put the wall clock of the guest behind
> > by the amount of time of the pause. This forces a guest to have ntp running
> > in order to keep the wall clock accurate.
>
> Avi,
>
> Is this set fit for merging or is there something else you want changed?
Eric,
On Message-ID: <20120210160536.GA23363@....cnet>, i asked:
How is the stub getting included for other architectures again?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists