[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120214164741.GA21185@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 17:47:41 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: apw@...onical.com, arjan@...ux.intel.com, fhrbata@...hat.com,
john.johansen@...onical.com, penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp,
rientjes@...gle.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au, tj@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/6] usermodehelper: introduce umh_complete(sub_info)
Preparation. Add the new trivial helper, umh_complete(). Currently
it simply does complete(sub_info->complete).
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
---
kernel/kmod.c | 9 +++++++--
1 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/kmod.c b/kernel/kmod.c
index a0a8854..8ea2594 100644
--- a/kernel/kmod.c
+++ b/kernel/kmod.c
@@ -199,6 +199,11 @@ void call_usermodehelper_freeinfo(struct subprocess_info *info)
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(call_usermodehelper_freeinfo);
+static void umh_complete(struct subprocess_info *sub_info)
+{
+ complete(sub_info->complete);
+}
+
/* Keventd can't block, but this (a child) can. */
static int wait_for_helper(void *data)
{
@@ -235,7 +240,7 @@ static int wait_for_helper(void *data)
sub_info->retval = ret;
}
- complete(sub_info->complete);
+ umh_complete(sub_info);
return 0;
}
@@ -269,7 +274,7 @@ static void __call_usermodehelper(struct work_struct *work)
case UMH_WAIT_EXEC:
if (pid < 0)
sub_info->retval = pid;
- complete(sub_info->complete);
+ umh_complete(sub_info);
}
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists