[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120214172340.GA22645@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:23:40 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Cc: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@...el.com>,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-am33-list@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/40] mn10300: Use set_current_blocked() and
block_sigmask()
On 02/14, David Howells wrote:
>
> Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:
>
> > asmlinkage long sys_sigsuspend(int history0, int history1, old_sigset_t mask)
> > {
> > - mask &= _BLOCKABLE;
> > - spin_lock_irq(¤t->sighand->siglock);
> > + sigset_t blocked;
> > +
> > current->saved_sigmask = current->blocked;
>
> Can this line create a race, now that it's not protected by a lock? It is
> possible for current->blocked to get altered by another thread.
No, only current can change ->blocked. This is even documented in
sigprocmask(). And more, the only correct way to change ->blocked
is set_current_blocked(). OK, with a couple of "I know what I am
doing" exceptions in kernel/signal.c.
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists