lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28189.1329244210@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:30:10 +0000
From:	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:	Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-am33-list@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/40] mn10300: Use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()


Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:

> > Can this line create a race, now that it's not protected by a lock?  It is
> > possible for current->blocked to get altered by another thread.
> 
> ->blocked can only ever be altered by current, not another thread. See
> the following comment from sigprocmask() in kernel/signal.c,

Okay, I've managed to convince myself.  Feel free to my Acked-by to the
MN10300 and FRV patches.

David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ