[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <28189.1329244210@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 18:30:10 +0000
From: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
Cc: dhowells@...hat.com, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-am33-list@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 20/40] mn10300: Use set_current_blocked() and block_sigmask()
Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote:
> > Can this line create a race, now that it's not protected by a lock? It is
> > possible for current->blocked to get altered by another thread.
>
> ->blocked can only ever be altered by current, not another thread. See
> the following comment from sigprocmask() in kernel/signal.c,
Okay, I've managed to convince myself. Feel free to my Acked-by to the
MN10300 and FRV patches.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists