[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120214151312.92afd44a.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:13:12 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...nvz.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
Andrey Vagin <avagin@...nvz.org>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Matt Helsley <matthltc@...ibm.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [patch 2/4] syscalls, x86: Add __NR_kcmp syscall v8
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 20:48:24 +0400
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org> wrote:
> While doing the checkpoint-restore in the user space one need to determine
> whether various kernel objects (like mm_struct-s of file_struct-s) are shared
> between tasks and restore this state.
>
> The 2nd step can be solved by using appropriate CLONE_ flags and the unshare
> syscall, while there's currently no ways for solving the 1st one.
>
> One of the ways for checking whether two tasks share e.g. mm_struct is to
> provide some mm_struct ID of a task to its proc file, but showing such
> info considered to be not that good for security reasons.
>
> Thus after some debates we end up in conclusion that using that named
> 'comparison' syscall might be the best candidate. So here is it --
> __NR_kcmp.
>
> It takes up to 5 arguments - the pids of the two tasks (which
> characteristics should be compared), the comparison type and
> (in case of comparison of files) two file descriptors.
>
> Lookups for pids are done in the caller's PID namespace only.
>
> At moment only x86 is supported and tested.
>
>
> ...
>
> --- /dev/null
> +++ linux-2.6.git/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/Makefile
> @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@
> +ifeq ($(strip $(V)),)
> + E = @echo
> + Q = @
> +else
> + E = @\#
> + Q =
> +endif
> +export E Q
> +
> +uname_M := $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not)
> +ARCH ?= $(shell echo $(uname_M) | sed -e s/i.86/i386/)
> +ifeq ($(ARCH),i386)
> + ARCH := X86
> + CFLAGS := -DCONFIG_X86_32 -D__i386__
> +endif
> +ifeq ($(ARCH),x86_64)
> + ARCH := X86
> + CFLAGS := -DCONFIG_X86_64 -D__x86_64__
> +endif
> +
> +CFLAGS += -I../../../../arch/x86/include/generated/
> +CFLAGS += -I../../../../include/
> +CFLAGS += -I../../../../usr/include/
> +
> +all:
> +ifeq ($(ARCH),X86)
> + $(E) " CC run_test"
> + $(Q) gcc $(CFLAGS) kcmp_test.c -o run_test
> +else
> + $(E) "Not an x86 target, can't build kcmp selftest"
> +endif
> +
> +clean:
> + $(E) " CLEAN"
> + $(Q) rm -fr ./run_test
> + $(Q) rm -fr ./test-file
hm, what does all this stuff in the selftest makefile do?
The selftests code has undergone some changes since you last looked.
The rules are, roughly:
- In tools/testing/selftests, a "make" will compile but not run all
selftest code.
- In tools/testing/selftests, a "make run_tests" will compile all
selftest code (if needed) and will then run all the tests.
If a test is not applicable (eg wrong architecture, kernel feature
not enabled, etc) then it should try to avoid breaking the build and,
when executed it should emit a diagnostic and then exit(0) (ie:
success) so as to avoid breaking the overall test run.
IOW, the test should only fail if the feature is present but isn't
working correctly.
Also, I hate with a passion Makefiles which hide the command lines from
me! So I nuked all that E and Q stuff.
Result:
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/Makefile~syscalls-x86-add-__nr_kcmp-syscall-v8-fix
+++ a/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp/Makefile
@@ -1,12 +1,3 @@
-ifeq ($(strip $(V)),)
- E = @echo
- Q = @
-else
- E = @\#
- Q =
-endif
-export E Q
-
uname_M := $(shell uname -m 2>/dev/null || echo not)
ARCH ?= $(shell echo $(uname_M) | sed -e s/i.86/i386/)
ifeq ($(ARCH),i386)
@@ -24,13 +15,14 @@ CFLAGS += -I../../../../usr/include/
all:
ifeq ($(ARCH),X86)
- $(E) " CC run_test"
- $(Q) gcc $(CFLAGS) kcmp_test.c -o run_test
+ gcc $(CFLAGS) kcmp_test.c -o run_test
else
- $(E) "Not an x86 target, can't build kcmp selftest"
+ echo "Not an x86 target, can't build kcmp selftest"
endif
+run-tests: all
+ ./kcmp_test
+
clean:
- $(E) " CLEAN"
- $(Q) rm -fr ./run_test
- $(Q) rm -fr ./test-file
+ rm -fr ./run_test
+ rm -fr ./test-file
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile~syscalls-x86-add-__nr_kcmp-syscall-v8-fix
+++ a/tools/testing/selftests/Makefile
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-TARGETS = breakpoints vm
+TARGETS = breakpoints vm kcmp
all:
for TARGET in $(TARGETS); do \
_
However that didn't work for me:
akpm:/usr/src/25/tools/testing/selftests/kcmp> make
gcc -DCONFIG_X86_64 -D__x86_64__ -I../../../../arch/x86/include/generated/ -I../../../../include/ -I../../../../usr/include/ kcmp_test.c -o run_test
kcmp_test.c: In function 'sys_kcmp':
kcmp_test.c:22: error: '__NR_kcmp' undeclared (first use in this function)
kcmp_test.c:22: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
kcmp_test.c:22: error: for each function it appears in.)
kcmp_test.c: In function 'main':
kcmp_test.c:69: warning: format '%2d' expects type 'int', but argument 4 has type 'long int'
kcmp_test.c:69: warning: format '%2d' expects type 'int', but argument 5 has type 'long int'
kcmp_test.c:69: warning: format '%2d' expects type 'int', but argument 6 has type 'long int'
kcmp_test.c:69: warning: format '%2d' expects type 'int', but argument 7 has type 'long int'
kcmp_test.c:69: warning: format '%2d' expects type 'int', but argument 8 has type 'long int'
kcmp_test.c:69: warning: format '%2d' expects type 'int', but argument 9 has type 'long int'
kcmp_test.c:69: warning: format '%2d' expects type 'int', but argument 10 has type 'long int'
kcmp_test.c:69: warning: format '%2d' expects type 'int', but argument 11 has type 'long int'
How are we supposed to be picking up __NR_kcmp?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists