linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120214234233.GA26381@kroah.com>
Date:	Tue, 14 Feb 2012 15:42:33 -0800
From:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To:	"Ramirez Luna, Omar" <omar.ramirez@...com>
Cc:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Víctor Manuel Jáquez <vjaquez@...lia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the staging tree with Linus' tree

On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 05:33:40PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 03:31:39PM -0600, Ramirez Luna, Omar wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 11:30 PM, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 03:48:06PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> >> >> Hi Greg,
> >> >>
> >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the staging tree got a conflict in
> >> >> drivers/staging/tidspbridge/rmgr/drv_interface.c between commit
> >> >> 5a63177a6967 ("staging: tidspbridge: fix bridge_open memory leaks") from
> >> >> Linus' tree and commit 518761dba127 ("staging: tidspbridge: remove unused
> >> >> header") from the staging tree.
> >> >>
> >> >> I fixed it up (I think - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks, I'll try to fix this up with a merge tomorrow to get this in
> >> > sync.
> >>
> >> 5a63177a6967 ("staging: tidspbridge: fix bridge_open memory leaks")
> >> was accidentally reverted with the merge of staging-3.3-rc3 on
> >> staging-next branch, the same patch still applies since the previous
> >> patch touching this code moves it some lines above.
> >
> > Ok, so what should I do here?  What patch should I apply to the
> > staging-next tree?  Just reapply 5a63177a6967?
> 
> Yes, reapplying 5a63177a6967 worked for me.

Ok, thanks, now done.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/