[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fd4b8ef9df0d19e20c07923077937231.squirrel@www.codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 01:36:52 -0800 (PST)
From: merez@...eaurora.org
To: "Seungwon Jeon" <tgih.jun@...sung.com>
Cc: linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, "'Chris Ball'" <cjb@...top.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/2] mmc: core: Support packed command for eMMC4.5
device
> @@ -1065,12 +1075,60 @@ static int mmc_blk_err_check(struct mmc_card
> *card,
> if (!brq->data.bytes_xfered)
> return MMC_BLK_RETRY;
>
> + if (mq_mrq->packed_cmd != MMC_PACKED_NONE) {
> + if (unlikely(brq->data.blocks << 9 != brq->data.bytes_xfered))
> + return MMC_BLK_PARTIAL;
> + else
> + return MMC_BLK_SUCCESS;
> + }
> +
> if (blk_rq_bytes(req) != brq->data.bytes_xfered)
> return MMC_BLK_PARTIAL;
>
> return MMC_BLK_SUCCESS;
> }
I think it would be best to keep the request length (brq->data.blocks << 9
or blk_rq_bytes(req)) in a variable and use it in the original if above.
This way you can avoid doubling the exit points from the function.
Thanks,
Maya Erez
Consultant for Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists