[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120215095216.GA29319@mudshark.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 09:52:16 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nathaniel Husted <nhusted@...il.com>,
Eric Paris <eparis@...hat.com>,
Dave Martin <dave.martin@...aro.org>,
Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: ptrace: Include linux/audit.h to fix build errors
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 08:36:09AM +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 01:36:28PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> > Include linux/audit.h to fix below build errors:
> >
> > CC arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.o
> > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c: In function 'syscall_trace':
> > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:919: error: implicit declaration of function 'audit_syscall_exit'
> > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:921: error: implicit declaration of function 'audit_syscall_entry'
> > arch/arm/kernel/ptrace.c:921: error: 'AUDIT_ARCH_ARMEB' undeclared (first use in this function)
>
> Err, can someone explain why we seem to tell the audit code that we're
> always big endian?
I can't see this patch in the linux-arm-kernel archives, so that's probably
why we missed it. The fix should be pretty straightforward though - Axel,
care to add the appropriate ifdeffery?
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists