[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAO+b5-rNF1R5NcSdVSsKLML4wyZBBGv-zUdq+B1y0kfHxLpupA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 12:29:06 +0100
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: "Jun'ichi Nomura" <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: Stefan Richter <stefanr@...6.in-berlin.de>,
jbottomley@...allels.com, linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org,
Huajun Li <huajun.li.lee@...il.com>,
Axel Theilmann <theilmann@...-sense.de>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Yet another hot unplug NULL pointer dereference (was Re: status
of oops in sd_revalidate_disk?)
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:26 AM, Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@...jp.nec.com> wrote:
> I think this patch is good, too.
> Since QUEUE_FLAG_DEAD is also racy, it is not much different
> from queuedata check, IMO.
Are you sure ? As far as I know the block layer takes care of
synchronizing queue flag modifications against request_fn invocations.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists