[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329327045.2293.156.camel@twins>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 18:30:45 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...omium.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sonnyrao@...omium.org,
olofj@...omium.org, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Perf: bug fix: distinguish between rename and exec
On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 09:57 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>
> I'm not Acme, but I do care. We use a lot of processes with named
> threads that give users an idea about the function of a particular
> thread.
>
But why would they care? If you're debugging its easy enough to see from
the backtrace and if you're not, most tools like top/ps don't even show
threads (by default).
So who cares what threads are called.
I realize I'm not going to convince anybody, but I genuinely don't see
the point of naming threads.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists