[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120215173817.GD9918@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 23:08:17 +0530
From: Srivatsa Vaddagiri <vatsa@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, pjt@...gle.com, efault@....de, venki@...gle.com,
suresh.b.siddha@...el.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Nikunj A. Dadhania" <nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: sched: Performance of Trade workload running inside VM
* Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> [2012-02-15 18:24:11]:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 22:40 +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
> > Ok ..let me see if these numbers highlight the problem better.
>
> does this translate like: I've no fscking clue,
I'd mentioned a possible reason earlier which is limiting VM1 to reach higher
utilization (which is the time it waits for cpu after wakeup):
>b. In the "all VMs active" case, VM1's vcpu tasks were found to incur
> "high" wait times when ttwo of VM1's tasks were scheduled on the same
> CPU (i.e a VCPU task had to wait behind a sibling VCPU task for
> obtaining CPU resource).
Let me get cpu wait time data and post it by tomorrow.
> but my tinker made it go away?
Do you have any other suggestions for me to try?
- vatsa
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists