| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120215023249.GB17149@infradead.org> Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2012 21:32:49 -0500 From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org> To: Mitsuo Hayasaka <mitsuo.hayasaka.hu@...achi.com> Cc: Ben Myers <bpm@....com>, Alex Elder <aelder@....com>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xfs@....sgi.com, xfs-masters@....sgi.com, yrl.pp-manager.tt@...achi.com Subject: Re: [PATCH -v2 2/3] xfs: make inode quota check more general On Mon, Feb 06, 2012 at 09:50:30PM +0900, Mitsuo Hayasaka wrote: > The xfs checks quota when reserving disk blocks and inodes. In the block > reservation, it checks if the total number of blocks including current > usage and new reservation exceed quota. In the inode reservation, > it checks using the total number of inodes including only current usage > without new reservation. However, this inode quota check works well > since the caller of xfs_trans_dquot() always sets the argument of the > number of new inode reservation to 1 or 0 and inode is reserved one by > one in current xfs. > > To make it more general, this patch changes it to the same way as the > block quota check. Looks good, Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists