lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F3BF989.8060607@garzik.org>
Date:	Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:29:29 -0500
From:	Jeff Garzik <jeff@...zik.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC:	Brian Norris <computersforpeace@...il.com>,
	Lin Ming <ming.m.lin@...el.com>,
	Norbert Preining <preining@...ic.at>,
	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	"stern@...land.harvard.edu >> Alan Stern" <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
	linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
	Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Jian Peng <jipeng2005@...il.com>,
	Kevin Cernekee <cernekee@...il.com>, valdis.kletnieks@...edu,
	Mark Lord <kernel@...savvy.com>
Subject: Re: Regression 3.2 -> 3.3-rc1 10 sec hang at boot and resume, COMRESET
 failed

On 02/15/2012 11:57 AM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Feb 14, 2012 at 09:15:32PM -0800, Brian Norris wrote:
>> Perhaps a module param (for ahci_platform) that sets a flag in
>> ata_port_info? I'm not sure if/how I'm allowed to introduce new ATA
>> flags...
>
> I think adding a module param directly to libahci.c should do.  Just
> add it after ignore_sss and apply it to all ahci's on the host.

A module parameter is not necessarily the best/only option. 
ahci_platform already has infrastructure set up to deal with 
platform-specific quirks.  An internal flag seems more appropriate to 
enable automatic handling of this on the specific platforms where it 
applies (plus the revert Tejun has already mentioned).

Nothing wrong with debugging the regression further (Brian's option #3), 
but in the meantime we need to be actively using the best known working 
state, which means making the "fix" opt-in rather than unconditional or 
opt-out.

	Jeff





--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ