[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F3BFFB3.1040907@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 11:55:47 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...omium.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...e.de>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sonnyrao@...omium.org,
olofj@...omium.org, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Perf: bug fix: distinguish between rename and exec
On 2/15/12 10:30 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 09:57 -0700, David Ahern wrote:
>>
>> I'm not Acme, but I do care. We use a lot of processes with named
>> threads that give users an idea about the function of a particular
>> thread.
>>
> But why would they care? If you're debugging its easy enough to see from
> the backtrace and if you're not, most tools like top/ps don't even show
> threads (by default).
>
> So who cares what threads are called.
>
> I realize I'm not going to convince anybody, but I genuinely don't see
> the point of naming threads.
Very subjective. How fast do you want your users/tech
staff/developers/QA testers to make sense of what is going on? Which is
more informative (process and thread names sanitized)
$ top -d5
top - 18:39:49 up 23:46, 1 user, load average: 0.75, 0.37, 0.24
Cpu(s): 11.0%us, 19.0%sy, 0.0%ni, 47.8%id, 0.0%wa, 0.3%hi, 21.8%si,
0.0%st
PID USER S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
3830 root S 62.4 1.1 1:16.68 myapp
Wow, myapp is sucking up CPU. I wonder what it's doing. 'H'.
With non-named threads:
top - 18:40:36 up 23:47, 1 user, load average: 0.89, 0.47, 0.28
Cpu(s): 15.5%us, 22.4%sy, 0.0%ni, 45.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.6%hi, 15.9%si,
0.0%st
PID USER S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
3891 root S 44.8 1.1 0:12.39 myapp
3879 root R 14.6 1.1 0:26.07 myapp
3893 root S 8.7 1.1 0:08.62 myapp
Ok, so 3 threads are dominating the CPU. I guess I need to hook up gdb
to find out which functional areas those threads are running. Or, for
one product I worked on you have to know that the thread map is dumped
to a file, get shell access, read it and mentally correlate lwps.
Or you can name the threads:
top - 18:40:36 up 23:47, 1 user, load average: 0.89, 0.47, 0.28
Cpu(s): 15.5%us, 22.4%sy, 0.0%ni, 45.7%id, 0.0%wa, 0.6%hi, 15.9%si,
0.0%st
PID USER S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
3891 root S 44.8 1.1 0:12.39 myapp:dispatch
3879 root R 14.6 1.1 0:26.07 myapp:my-mgr
3893 root S 8.7 1.1 0:08.62 myapp:worker
Sure process knowledge is needed but top gives a lot more information
for named threads.
Even with perf having named threads makes the event dumps 100x more
understandable because the comm name gives you a hint about what the
task is does.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists