[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329281947.2555.26.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 05:59:07 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] percpu: use raw_local_irq_* in _this_cpu op
Le mercredi 15 février 2012 à 12:36 +0800, Ming Lei a écrit :
> It doesn't make sense to trace irq off or do irq flags
> lock proving inside 'this_cpu' operations, so replace local_irq_*
> with raw_local_irq_* in 'this_cpu' op.
...
> Acked-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
> ---
> include/linux/percpu.h | 20 ++++++++++----------
> 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/percpu.h b/include/linux/percpu.h
> index 6e68d05..5ed1e38 100644
> --- a/include/linux/percpu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/percpu.h
> @@ -294,9 +294,9 @@ do { \
> #define _this_cpu_generic_to_op(pcp, val, op) \
> do { \
> unsigned long flags; \
> - local_irq_save(flags); \
> + raw_local_irq_save(flags); \
> *__this_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)) op val; \
> - local_irq_restore(flags); \
> + raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
> } while (0)
>
Could you check the alignement of trailing '\' ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists