[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329285786.2555.38.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 07:03:06 +0100
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] percpu: use raw_local_irq_* in _this_cpu op
Le mercredi 15 février 2012 à 13:08 +0800, Ming Lei a écrit :
> Just several warnings, no errors. Also the 5 warnings are introduced
> by previous commit, sounds nothing to do with motivation of this patch.
> You may prepare a standalone patch to fix all the code style in this file, :-)
>
Oh well, I dont use checkpatch but spoke about trailing \
Cant you see them on your screen ?
We had :
#define _this_cpu_generic_to_op(pcp, val, op) \
do { \
unsigned long flags; \
local_irq_save(flags); \
*__this_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)) op val; \
local_irq_restore(flags); \
} while (0)
You want :
#define _this_cpu_generic_to_op(pcp, val, op) \
do { \
unsigned long flags; \
raw_local_irq_save(flags); \
*__this_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)) op val; \
raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
} while (0)
I suggest :
#define _this_cpu_generic_to_op(pcp, val, op) \
do { \
unsigned long flags; \
raw_local_irq_save(flags); \
*__this_cpu_ptr(&(pcp)) op val; \
raw_local_irq_restore(flags); \
} while (0)
Is it clear now ?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists