[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120215165408.a111eefa.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:54:08 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...fujitsu.com>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/6] introduce pmd_to_pte_t()
On Wed, 8 Feb 2012 10:51:41 -0500
Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com> wrote:
> Casting pmd into pte_t to handle thp is strongly architecture dependent.
> This patch introduces a new function to separate this dependency from
> independent part.
>
>
> ...
>
> --- 3.3-rc2.orig/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> +++ 3.3-rc2/include/asm-generic/pgtable.h
> @@ -434,6 +434,10 @@ static inline int pmd_trans_splitting(pmd_t pmd)
> {
> return 0;
> }
> +static inline pte_t pmd_to_pte_t(pmd_t *pmd)
> +{
> + return 0;
> +}
This doesn't compile.
And I can't think of a sensible way of generating a stub for this
operation - if you have a pmd_t and want to convert it to a pte_t then
just convert it, dammit. And there's no rationality behind making that
conversion unavailable or inoperative if CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE=n?
Shudder. I'll drop the patch. Rethink, please.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists