linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: handle isolated pages with lru lock released

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAJd=RBCpE9TUDwr17sGc2mg_xfyCCktAyxSt1v3Tzj6dCNL0eA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:01:43 +0800
From:	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc:	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm: vmscan: handle isolated pages with lru lock released

On Fri, Feb 3, 2012 at 9:40 AM, Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com> wrote:
> From: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
>
> When shrinking inactive lru list, isolated pages are queued on locally private
> list, so the lock-hold time could be reduced if pages are counted without lock
> protection.
>
> To achieve that, firstly updating reclaim stat is delayed until the
> putback stage, after reacquiring the lru lock.
>
> Secondly, operations related to vm and zone stats are now proteced with
> preemption disabled as they are per-cpu operations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
> Acked-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> Reviewed-by: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
> ---
> KAMEZAWA-san and I both admired this patch from Hillf; Rik and David
> liked its precursor: I think we'd all be glad to see it in linux-next.
>
>  mm/vmscan.c |   21 ++++++++++-----------
>  1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c       Sat Jan 14 14:02:20 2012
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c       Sat Jan 14 20:00:46 2012
> @@ -1414,7 +1414,6 @@ update_isolated_counts(struct mem_cgroup
>                       unsigned long *nr_anon,
>                       unsigned long *nr_file)
>  {
> -       struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(mz);
>        struct zone *zone = mz->zone;
>        unsigned int count[NR_LRU_LISTS] = { 0, };
>        unsigned long nr_active = 0;
> @@ -1435,6 +1434,7 @@ update_isolated_counts(struct mem_cgroup
>                count[lru] += numpages;
>        }
>
> +       preempt_disable();
>        __count_vm_events(PGDEACTIVATE, nr_active);
>
>        __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ACTIVE_FILE,
> @@ -1449,8 +1449,9 @@ update_isolated_counts(struct mem_cgroup
>        *nr_anon = count[LRU_ACTIVE_ANON] + count[LRU_INACTIVE_ANON];
>        *nr_file = count[LRU_ACTIVE_FILE] + count[LRU_INACTIVE_FILE];
>
> -       reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[0] += *nr_anon;
> -       reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[1] += *nr_file;
> +       __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON, *nr_anon);
> +       __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE, *nr_file);
> +       preempt_enable();
>  }
>
>  /*
> @@ -1512,6 +1513,7 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to
>        unsigned long nr_writeback = 0;
>        isolate_mode_t reclaim_mode = ISOLATE_INACTIVE;
>        struct zone *zone = mz->zone;
> +       struct zone_reclaim_stat *reclaim_stat = get_reclaim_stat(mz);
>
>        while (unlikely(too_many_isolated(zone, file, sc))) {
>                congestion_wait(BLK_RW_ASYNC, HZ/10);
> @@ -1546,19 +1548,13 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to
>                        __count_zone_vm_events(PGSCAN_DIRECT, zone,
>                                               nr_scanned);
>        }
> +       spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
>
> -       if (nr_taken == 0) {
> -               spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> +       if (nr_taken == 0)
>                return 0;
> -       }
>
>        update_isolated_counts(mz, &page_list, &nr_anon, &nr_file);
>
> -       __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_ANON, nr_anon);
> -       __mod_zone_page_state(zone, NR_ISOLATED_FILE, nr_file);
> -
> -       spin_unlock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> -
>        nr_reclaimed = shrink_page_list(&page_list, mz, sc, priority,
>                                                &nr_dirty, &nr_writeback);
>
> @@ -1570,6 +1566,9 @@ shrink_inactive_list(unsigned long nr_to
>        }
>
>        spin_lock_irq(&zone->lru_lock);
> +
> +       reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[0] += nr_anon;
> +       reclaim_stat->recent_scanned[1] += nr_file;
>
>        if (current_is_kswapd())
>                __count_vm_events(KSWAPD_STEAL, nr_reclaimed);

Hi Andrew

Please consider adding this patch to -mm tree.

Thanks
Hillf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/