linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1329400699.2293.221.camel@twins>
Date:	Thu, 16 Feb 2012 14:58:19 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/6] ARM: Remove the __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW
 definition

On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 17:42 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> This is version 3 of the set of patches removing
> __ARCH_WANT_INTERRUPTS_ON_CTXSW on ARM. The series was rebased on top of
> 3.3-rc1 and fixed the conflicts with the kernel/sched/ changes and the
> ARM LPAE patches. There are no functional changes from v2. I plan to
> push this to -next and get it ready for 3.4-rc1.
> 
> Question for Peter/Ingo - how do we merge the first patch that
> introduces finish_arch_post_lock_switch? Do you pick it up or I can
> merge it via rmk (with your ack)?

Russell, what's the status of these patches? I'd like to see them land
in 3.4 if possible.

If you take them in your arm tree, I can ask Ingo to pull from there and
then I can build on them from there..
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/