| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CABeCy1advFb8QpX5wDBYo0_N8Rtu2=G88kCC2_KVyw=w7pNdzw@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 17:58:07 -0800 From: Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com> To: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...il.com>, Mike Travis <travis@....com>, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>, Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] arch/ia64: remove references to cpu_*_map. On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> wrote: > On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 13:02:40 -0800, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote: >> On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 16:23:34 +0530 >> "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> > This patch ought to go along with the patchsets that do cleanups in other >> > architectures as well.. And it looks like Rusty's patchset[1] is a superset of >> > Venki's patchset[2].. So, Rusty, would you kindly take this patch into your >> > patchset? (It should come before the 11/12 in your patchset. This should apply >> > at that point easily, because I have modified it to suit your 11/12 which also >> > touches ia64). >> >> OK, I'm officially all confused. I think I'll drop everything and wait >> until it settles down. Please, someone prepare a single patch series. >> >> The cpumask-related patches whcih I'm currently holding are: >> >> smp-introduce-a-generic-on_each_cpu_mask-function.patch >> #arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold >> arm-move-arm-over-to-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch >> #tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch: fold >> tile-move-tile-to-use-generic-on_each_cpu_mask.patch >> smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func.patch >> smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-fix.patch >> smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update.patch >> smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-update-fix.patch >> smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9.patch >> smp-add-func-to-ipi-cpus-based-on-parameter-func-v9-fix.patch >> slub-only-ipi-cpus-that-have-per-cpu-obj-to-flush.patch >> fs-only-send-ipi-to-invalidate-lru-bh-when-needed.patch >> mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist.patch >> mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-update.patch >> mm-only-ipi-cpus-to-drain-local-pages-if-they-exist-v9.patch >> # >> arch-ia64-remove-references-to-cpu__map.patch >> cpumask-avoid-mask-based-num_possible_cpus-and-num_online_cpus.patch >> >> So I'm thinking the thing to do is to drop just the final two? > > Keep them all, I'll rebase on top of linux-next, and send you a few > patches. I'm not going to break down by arch, that was just in the hope > that the arch maintainers themselves would take them... > Rusty, Can you include cpumask-avoid-mask-based-num_possible_cpus-and-num_online_cpus.patch from akpm's list as last patch in your series and with Andrew dropping it. That will make sure things doesn't break in some intermediate state. Thanks, Venki -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists