[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120216142356.GB2541@pengutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 15:23:56 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Oskar Schirmer <oskar@...ra.com>
Cc: wim@...ana.be, s.hauer@...gutronix.de,
linux-watchdog@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] watchdog: make imx2_wdt report boot status correctly
> Seen from the perspective of code compactness ("save some lines"),
> one could try to be consequent here, and save the "val" variable
> altogether, ending up with some "new_value = __raw_readw ... & ... ? ... : 0;"
> But eventually there might be code readability issues, so it's
> a good idea to keep the balance.
Yes.
> An argument for the original, longer version might be it is easier
> to extend, when more flags need to be handled, like
> "else if (val & ...) new_value = ...", while nested conditional
> expressions would most likely become quite complex soon.
Once we have support to handle non-stoppable watchdogs in the the new
watchdog framework, the code will be greatly refactored anyhow :)
Thanks,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists