[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo57hL9dFyFDvdEQcLKCPOeCh3MY3UCURvrXKPpA8W3y3A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:49:00 -0800
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>,
Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@...tuousgeek.org>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] PCI: quirk print dev name with duration
On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 11:07 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 21:43 -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
>> On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 21:35 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> > On Wed, Feb 15, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
>> > > On Wed, 2012-02-15 at 21:14 -0800, Yinghai Lu wrote:
>> > >> So could find out which device is involved with the calling
>> > > []
>> > >> +++ linux-2.6/drivers/pci/quirks.c
>> > >> @@ -2854,14 +2854,15 @@ static void do_one_fixup_debug(void (*fn
>> > >> ktime_t calltime, delta, rettime;
>> > >> unsigned long long duration;
>> > >>
>> > >> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling %pF @ %i\n", fn, task_pid_nr(current));
>> > >> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "calling %pF @ %i for %s\n",
>> > >> + fn, task_pid_nr(current), dev_name(&dev->dev));
>> > >
>> > > Might be better to use dev_dbg
>> > >
>> > > dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "calling %pF @ %i\n", fn, task_pid_nr(current));
>> > >
>> > > []
>> > >
>> > >> - printk(KERN_DEBUG "pci fixup %pF returned after %lld usecs\n", fn,
>> > >> - duration);
>> > >> + printk(KERN_DEBUG "pci fixup %pF returned after %lld usecs for %s\n",
>> > >> + fn, duration, dev_name(&dev->dev));
>> > >
>> > > dev_dbg(&dev->dev, "pci fixup %pF returned after %llu usecs\n",
>> > > fn, duration);
>> > Not sure if that is going to break Arjan 's tool that analyze the boot time.
>> That depends on the tool code.
> []
>> Do you have a link to the tool?
>
> That tool would be scripts/bootgraph.pl and using
> dev_dbg would break it unless it's adapted to the
> change. Your change seems fine for now.
Since we're adding new functionality (analyzing quirk durations), I
think it would be fair game to update the tool at the same time so it
could parse the dev_dbg() format.
For things related specifically to a device, we have a pretty good
record of trying to use dev_*() consistently, so I do have a
preference for continuing that.
If you do change, remember that dev_dbg() is different from
printk(KERN_DEBUG) in that printk(KERN_DEBUG) is always compiled-in
and always goes to the dmesg, but dev_dbg() is only compiled in when
DEBUG is defined, so dev_printk(KERN_DEBUG) would be a more direct
replacement for printk(KERN_DEBUG).
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists