[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdaFyxU-gq5ETnNc4LonTo98PbUs09CmvsPUqzyt0Mg2Cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 21:00:28 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
"dunlap@...otime.net" <dunlap@...otime.net>,
"lrg@...com" <lrg@...com>,
"broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com"
<broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>,
"linux-doc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V1 2/3] Documentation: gpio: Add details of open-drain configuration
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 9:28 AM, Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com> wrote:
> Yes, I can add the open source also but like to be in incremental change.
> Not together with open drain.
> We can go with:
> - open drain core driver support.
> - open drain sysfs interface support
> - open source core driver support
> - open source sysfs interface.
>
> I have already changes for the first 2 which we can review/apply,
> Meanwhile I will work on open source support.
>
> Does it look good?
Well as a patch concept it is OK but I have real bad feelings about
patch [2/4] and [4/4] adding sysfs.
What the GPIO subsystem really needs is to get rid of sysfs
interfaces, have them deprecated and replaced with a
per-gpiochip /dev/gpioN with ioctl()s or similar instead. The sysfs
interface is just ... it won't scale.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists