lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F3DEDC3.4010004@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:03:47 +0800
From:	Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v5] sched: Avoid unnecessary work in reweight_entity

From: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

In original code, using account_entity_dequeue and account_entity_enqueue
as a pair will do some work unnecessary, such like remove node from list
and add it back again immediately.

And because there are no really enqueue and dequeue happen here, it is not
suitable to use account_entity_dequeue and account_entity_enqueue here.

This patch combine the work of them in order to save time.

since v1:
	Add more description.
	Mark add_cfs_task_weight as inline. 
	correct useless and wrong code. 
	Add check point for the case there is no change on weight.

Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 kernel/sched/fair.c |   16 ++++++++++------
 1 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 7c6414f..20aa355 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -777,7 +777,7 @@ update_stats_curr_start(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se)
  */
 
 #if defined CONFIG_SMP && defined CONFIG_FAIR_GROUP_SCHED
-static void
+static inline void
 add_cfs_task_weight(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, unsigned long weight)
 {
 	cfs_rq->task_weight += weight;
@@ -938,20 +938,24 @@ static inline void update_entity_shares_tick(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 {
 }
 # endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
+
 static void reweight_entity(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq, struct sched_entity *se,
 			    unsigned long weight)
 {
+	if (weight == se->load.weight)
+		return;
+
 	if (se->on_rq) {
 		/* commit outstanding execution time */
 		if (cfs_rq->curr == se)
 			update_curr(cfs_rq);
-		account_entity_dequeue(cfs_rq, se);
+		update_load_add(&cfs_rq->load, weight - se->load.weight);
+		if (!parent_entity(se))
+			update_load_add(&rq_of(cfs_rq)->load, weight - se->load.weight);
+		if (entity_is_task(se))
+			add_cfs_task_weight(cfs_rq, weight - se->load.weight);
 	}
-
 	update_load_set(&se->load, weight);
-
-	if (se->on_rq)
-		account_entity_enqueue(cfs_rq, se);
 }
 
 static void update_cfs_shares(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
-- 
1.7.4.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ