| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120217112117.GB14789@elte.hu> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:21:17 +0100 From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> To: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Huang Ying <huang.ying.caritas@...il.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "x86, efi: Calling __pa() with an ioremap()ed address is invalid" * Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote: > On Wed, 2012-02-08 at 09:15 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: > > <#part sign=pgpmime> > > On Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:46:49 +0000, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org> wrote: > > > > > Ping? Keith, have you had chance to test this patch yet? > > > > No, I haven't had a chance to try the patch, and I'm leaving > > on vacation tomorrow until March 1... > > Hmm... I haven't been able to find anybody else willing to > test this patch either. > > Ingo, got any opinions on how to handle this? Please send the latest and I'll apply it. If we don't get voluntary testers then involuntary ones will have to do :-/ Thanks, Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists