[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F3E71D2.5080306@ti.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:57:14 +0530
From: Aneesh V <aneesh@...com>
To: "Cousson, Benoit" <b-cousson@...com>
CC: linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/8] misc: emif: add basic infrastructure for EMIF
driver
On Friday 17 February 2012 07:14 PM, Cousson, Benoit wrote:
> Hi Aneesh,
[...]
>>>> + emif = kzalloc(sizeof(struct emif_data), GFP_KERNEL);
>>>
>>> You should use the devm_* version of this API to get the simplify the
>>> error handling / removal.
>>
>> Please note that most of my allocations are happening through
>> kmemdup(). kmemdup() doesn't have a devm_* equivalent. So, I have a
>> cleanup() function and in the interest of uniformity decided to avoid
>> devm_* variants altogether.
>
> I think it still worth using devm_kzalloc + memcopy here instead of
> kmemdup to avoid the cleanup() and simplify as well the error handling.
I will do that.
>
> You might even propose a new devm_kmemdup API if you want.
Ok. I will attempt that, maybe both devm_kmalloc() and devm_kmemdup().
But I would like to de-couple that from this series. That is, I will do
the patch separately and if that gets up-streamed I will update EMIF
driver to use them. Until then I will go with what you suggested above.
br,
Aneesh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists