[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120217180538.GA11520@merkur.ravnborg.org>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 19:05:38 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Milton Miller <miltonm@....com>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/27] irq_domain generalization and rework
> >
> > /*
> > * Please do not include this file in generic code. There is currently
> > * no requirement for any architecture to implement anything held
> > * within this file.
> > *
> > * Thanks. --rmk
> > */
> >
> > A quick grep indicates that we've lost this battle ;) Is the comments
> > still true? Should we stop discouraging inclusion of linux/irq.h?
> > Does anyone even know that it's discouraged ;)
>
> It's still true for any platform which hasn't been converted to genirq,
> as such a platform would not have asm/hw_irq.h.
In-tree only s390 is not using genirq.
All the rest are converted and provide hw_irq.h -
most of the new archs provide hw_irq via asm-generic so it does
not show up unless you look in the Kbuild file,.
Sam
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists