[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4F3E9C1B.5040404@freescale.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 12:27:39 -0600
From: Scott Wood <scottwood@...escale.com>
To: Alexander Graf <agraf@...e.de>
CC: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Anthony Liguori <anthony@...emonkey.ws>,
KVM list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@...gnu.org>,
kvm-ppc <kvm-ppc@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC] Next gen kvm api
On 02/16/2012 06:23 PM, Alexander Graf wrote:
> On 16.02.2012, at 21:41, Scott Wood wrote:
>> And yes, we do have fancier hardware coming fairly soon for which this
>> breaks (TLB0 entries can be loaded without host involvement, as long as
>> there's a translation from guest physical to physical in a separate
>> hardware table). It'd be reasonable to ignore TLB0 for migration (treat
>> it as invalidated), but not for debug since that may be where the
>> translation we're interested in resides.
>
> Could we maybe add an ioctl that forces kvm to read out the current tlb0 contents and push them to memory? How slow would that be?
Yes, I was thinking something like that. We'd just have to remove (make
conditional on MMU type) the statement that this is synchronized
implicitly on return from vcpu_run.
Performance shouldn't be a problem -- we'd only need to sync once and
then can do all the repeated debug accesses we want. So should be no
need to mess around with partial sync.
-Scott
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists