[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1329504344.584.18.camel@joe2Laptop>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:45:44 -0800
From: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
To: Luis Felipe Strano Moraes <lfelipe@...fusion.mobi>
Cc: linville@...driver.com, johannes@...solutions.net,
davem@...emloft.net, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Cleaning up code formatting errors in net/wireless
pointed out by checkpatch.
On Fri, 2012-02-17 at 07:30 -0800, Luis Felipe Strano Moraes wrote:
> These are mostly minor changes and they are being sent as one patch only in
> order to cause the smallest amount of disruption.
[]
> diff --git a/net/wireless/core.c b/net/wireless/core.c
[]
> @@ -668,7 +668,7 @@ void wiphy_unregister(struct wiphy *wiphy)
> mutex_lock(&rdev->devlist_mtx);
> __count = rdev->opencount;
> mutex_unlock(&rdev->devlist_mtx);
> - __count == 0;}));
> + __count == 0; }));
Inline statement expressions are pretty unusual
for kernel sources. Normally these are used via
macro.
I'd try to make the statement expression visually
distinct. Something like:
wait_event(rdev->dev_wait,
({
int __count;
mutex_lock(&rdev->devlist_mtx);
__count = rdev->opencount;
mutex_unlock(&rdev->devlist_mtx);
__count == 0;
})
);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists