| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20120217192724.GC2707@elf.ucw.cz> Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 20:27:24 +0100 From: Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz> To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl> Cc: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...oldbits.com>, Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>, Linux PM mailing list <linux-pm@...ts.linux-foundation.org>, Jean Pihet <j-pihet@...com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Mark Gross <markgross@...gnar.org> Subject: Re: [linux-pm] [PATCH] PM / QoS: unconditionally build the feature On Mon 2012-02-13 16:41:10, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Monday, February 13, 2012, Jean Pihet wrote: > > The PM QoS feature depends on CONFIG_PM which depends on > > PM_SLEEP || PM_RUNTIME. This breaks CPU C-states with kernels > > not having these CONFIGs. > > > > This patch allows the feature in all cases. > > > > Signed-off-by: Jean Pihet <j-pihet@...com> > > Reported-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com> > > Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@...k.pl> > > Cc: Mark Gross <markgross@...gnar.org> > > Applied, but I modified the changelog (please have a look at the > linux-pm/pm-qos branch for details). Is it good idea? For servers, power management / QoS is not neccessary... What about fixing kconfig, instead? Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists