[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120217221005.GX2976@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 14:10:05 -0800
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH next] rcu: stop spurious warnings from
synchronize_sched_expedited
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 01:20:31PM -0800, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> synchronize_sched_expedited() is spamming CONFIG_DEBUG_PREEMPT=y
> users with an unintended warning from the cpu_is_offline() check:
> use raw_smp_processor_id() instead of smp_processor_id() there.
Good catch! Queued.
Thanx, Paul
> Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
> ---
>
> kernel/rcutree.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> --- next/kernel/rcutree.c 2012-02-17 08:02:15.680065066 -0800
> +++ linux/kernel/rcutree.c 2012-02-17 10:41:18.764003566 -0800
> @@ -2014,7 +2014,7 @@ void synchronize_sched_expedited(void)
> /* Note that atomic_inc_return() implies full memory barrier. */
> firstsnap = snap = atomic_inc_return(&sync_sched_expedited_started);
> get_online_cpus();
> - WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(smp_processor_id()));
> + WARN_ON_ONCE(cpu_is_offline(raw_smp_processor_id()));
>
> /*
> * Each pass through the following loop attempts to force a
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists