[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120217222922.GA2741@homac.suse.de>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 23:29:22 +0100
From: Holger Macht <holger@...ac.de>
To: Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>
Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: dock_link_device is oopsy
On Fr 17. Feb - 13:46:04, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Matthew,
>
> A linux-next oops at bootup in dock_link_device() tells me that you
> were not feeling well when you wrote that and dock_unlink_device():
> I hope you're feeling better now and can rewrite them soon.
Andrew Morton experienced a similar problem. What system are you using?
I didn't encounter this problem with the systems I tested with.
Do you actually have a /sys/devices/platform/dock.?/ directory with a
file 'type' that contains 'dock_station'?
> I think my particular problem comes from dock_station_count 0,
> so kmalloc() returns NULL, which you don't check for. But those
> functions appear to be minor masterpieces of doing things in the
> wrong order, not checking allocation, not freeing resource on failure.
>
> I'm not attaching a proposed patch because, on that record, I bet when
> you look closer you'll find more wrong that I wouldn't know about.
>
> Let's hope this isn't diverted into an endless discussion of whether
> you ought to use kaalloc() or kballoc() or .... me, I'd just like to
> boot, and have put #if 0..#endif around everything in those functions.
Nevertheless, we should check for this error case or make sure we aren't
able to run into it.
Thanks,
Holger
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists